California legislature introduces bill to end bear hunting

Senate Bill No. 252 would make hunting bears in any matter illegal in California

Matthew Clark
  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Facebook

  • Email

California black bear bill h1

Cresting a ridge and dropping into a meadow, deep in the heart of the eastern Sierras, the sun begins to break the horizon. My father leading my brother and me through the steam of the early morning, we are in pursuit of mule deer. Skirting the edge of the meadow, I hear my father yell “Oh Shit!” as the bushes, not ten yards in front of him explode and the all too familiar “woof” of a black bear making its way up a hill. Being the only one with a bear tag in my pocket both my companions turned to me urging me to get ready to shoot the mature boar. The deep-toned red/blonde bear turned and looked back at us at 60 yards, I raised my rifle, flipped off the safety, settled the reticle on the vitals, and “click”. I racked a round through the bolt action as fast as I could only to see the hindquarters disappearing from the countryside. I was 15 years old and I have been obsessed with hunting bears in California ever since.

I recall sitting around multi-generational family dinner tables listening to tales of running black bears with hounds in the marble mountains of northern California. My grandfather, my father, and my uncle had successfully taken black bears this way, and there was nothing inhumane about the practice. The stories they told were of camaraderie, hard work, stewardship, and providing for your family. With no natural predators in the area and with woods too overgrown for other tactics to be effective, hounds were the only reasonable way to keep bear populations within management numbers. I think back to my hunter education course and being taught the importance of not only hunting ungulates but also predator management and having the same respect for those animals as we do more targeted species.

With the introduction of Senate Bill No. 252 to the California Legislature, the future of bear hunting in the Golden State stands in the crosshairs “... unlawful to hunt, trap, or otherwise take a bear of the genus Euarctos or the species Ursus americanus, except under specified circumstances, including under a depredation permit.” This is in direct violation of Fish and Game code 1801, specifically subsection E which states, “To maintain diversified recreational uses of wildlife, including the sport of hunting, as proper uses of certain designated species of wildlife, subject to regulations consistent with the maintenance of healthy, viable wildlife resources, the public safety, and a quality outdoor experience.”

This proposed legislation is an egregious violation of the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation which states “Science is the proper tool for discharge of wildlife policy. In order to manage wildlife as a shared resource fairly, objectively, and knowledgeably, decisions must be based on sound science such as annual waterfowl population surveys and the work of professional wildlife biologists.” Given that black bear populations are on the rise and appearing in areas that they haven't been seen in almost 50 years, the idea of any proposed legislation to eliminate one of the only tools for managing the population should be considered nothing other than a complete and utter lack of understanding of game management practices.

Black bears have a long history in California, originally classified as a fur-bearing species in 1917, it was not until 1948 that restrictions on how or when bears could be hunted were implemented. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) declares, “In 1957 hunters were required to purchase bear tags and those who were successful returned the report card portion of the tag that provided information on locality and date of kill as well as the sex and age (adult or cub) of the bear that was taken.” The state agency relies heavily upon hunting and hunter reporting to manage the population of bears. Biologists at the CDFW closely monitor the state's black bear population by collecting teeth from hunter-killed bears.

Gear shop bar 1

This is not the first time that the state has passed legislation to restrict the ability to hunt black bears under the guise of cruelty and archaic practices. In 2012, Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill that banned the hunting of black bears and bobcats with the use of hounds. The year following the ban, the number of bears killed in the state fell by nearly 50% with just under 1,500 fewer tags issued in the same year.

With a growing population of black bears, California faces an uphill battle with the management of another apex predator. This legislation is nothing else if not reminiscent of the mountain lion hunting ban that was implemented in 1990. CDFW claims that “any statewide estimate of the mountain lion population is just a "guesstimate. The lion population is relatively high in California and their numbers appear to be stable.” The state faces more uncertainty concerning populations of predators if this legislation passes. The fact of the matter is that hunters and hunting is one of the most effective tools for game management. The argument that hunting is archaic and inhumane lacks perspective on the circle of life and man’s place in the stewardship of the land.

If passed, this would be an affront to science-based wildlife management. I urge each and every one of you to contact the lawmakers of California and plead your case in a respectful manner. You can do that on a Change.org petition HERE and also HERE. We cannot allow SB 252 to pass. This is something we must take an unrelenting stance on.


  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Facebook

  • Email

20 Comments

Want to join the conversation?Sign uporlog into post and reply.

Duane Stacher

Duane Stacher

insider

2/2/2021, 6:49:51 PM

Eric, yes FACTS DO NOT MATTER!!! How do you persuade someone that wont listen? If good management practices don't seem to have any effect on opinions then what is it we use to make them listen? It is not even hunting that should be the issue. It is the management of the resource. Hunting is a tool to help control both predator and prey alike. Too many of either is not good for that species. We hunted for food to survive in our history. That is no longer the case, but the use of hunting is the best tool to help control both of the animal groups. To help the uneducated see, we could film the slaughter of very cute little spotted "DISNEY" fawns being plucked from their hiding places and devoured alive by bears, wolfs, lions, like berries from the vines. Some may say that is the Natural order, but no. With our cities and highways that encroach into the land, this is the new Natural Order and it needs to be managed or it all goes to HELL! I dont have the answers on how to reach the uneducated, but I do know that the never ending assault on good management, science and proven results is going to bring an end to hunting, (CONTROLLED MANAGEMENT), and the very ANIMALS THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO HELP! Many of these policies that have been implemented or planned to be, (grizzly bears to go along with the wolfs, cats, and black bears) will be irreversible!! Many of these animals will not withstand the onslaught of predation and then the predators will die themselves from lack of food or disease. It sounds that if the uneducated continue to rule, the end result will be guaranteed!

Eric Ackerman

Eric Ackerman

insider

2/2/2021, 4:42:02 AM

LOL. Science doesn’t matter nor do facts! It’s all about persuading the public to be indifferent to hunting. The bigger the cities the more easily they can be persuaded to believe lies about hunting and they will hold up the worst examples of bad hunters as what we all are collectively. It’s easier to argue against hunting than for it. “It’s cruel” vs “bla bla, bla”- I took up hunting 4 years ago. I tell everyone I can how difficult it is and how I and others help conservation and I even donate otherwise to conservation. I am raising my two kids to hunt and respect the creatures that nourish us. Cheering a successful hunt shouldn’t be banned or discouraged but be prepared to explain yourself to others where they understand and not judge. The more diverse the crowd that gets to hunt the more likely it will endure. Maybe taking som city kids out to the forest is what we should be doing and not trolling vegans. There used to be a small minority opposing hunting.....it’s growing under the guise of kindness. The proverb: “The road to hell is paved with good intentions” seems appropriate here. Not everything that seems kind is kind in the long run. Sometimes kindness is worse than what seems cruel. Persuade don’t argue and remember facts don’t matter as much as they should.

Duane Stacher

Duane Stacher

insider

2/2/2021, 3:19:44 AM

Great to hear!!! Now to address Chris's comments. 1. how did talking to the "other side with empathy " work for the logging and forest industry!!! :Thousands of jobs and MILLIONS OF ACRES BURNT WITH THE "OTHER SIDE" MANAGEMENT! 2. how did talking with the "other side with empathy" work with the VERY successful lion predator program! : the endless cat kills that we now find in the woods today! Lions seen in towns and backwards! 3: how did talking with the "other side with empathy" work for the many families like Matt's that saw the end to a way of life! : the non stop grazing of bears in the meadows in the spring, killing any and all fawns. The trips into the woods where 3,4, or more bears are seen and 0 DEER! 4. how did talking with the "other side with empathy" work when wolves were placed back to pray on the elk herds, and what remains of our now near extent deer herds, that we worked and spent so much time and money getting them to return!!! Talking to the "other side with empathy" seems to work well for them and what they want, weather they are educated, ill informed, or misguided to the actual facts or not. Their good intentions seem to be based on "Disney" versions and cant seem to find the facts or best practices that are used in so many other states that don't seem to have the same "OTHER SIDE" choosing how things should be run! I myself believe that if what we have been doing does not seem to be working then we need to change how we go about the problem. That is unless the "other side with empathy" plan IS working just fine and the end result is to eliminate all hunting in california!!! I think we have been listening to the "other side with empathy" far tooo long!!!!

There's no better time to join GOHUNT

Sign up for access to the best research tools, maps, gear shop, and community in hunting